Newly declassified documents reveal that twice-failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton endorsed a strategy devised by one of her campaign aides to “smear” then-candidate Donald Trump with unfounded allegations of Russian involvement and divert attention from her own growing email issue during the 2016 race.

The strategy called for “raising the theme of ‘Putin’s support for Trump'” and “subsequently steering public opinion toward the notion that it needs to equate” genuine electoral infrastructure tampering with the Russian leader’s political influence effort.

“Clinton approved a plan proposed by one of her foreign policy advisors, Julianne Smith, to ‘smear Donald Trump by magnifying the scandal tied to the intrusion by the Russian special services in the pre-election process to benefit the Republican candidate,’” one of the declassified

memos read.

Special Counsel John Durham discovered the information during a multi-year investigation into intelligence operations related to the 2016 election.

At Sen. Chuck Grassley’s (R-Iowa) request, FBI Director Kash Patel, Attorney General Pam Bondi, and other US intelligence officials declassified the files from Durham’s investigation.

“Based on the Durham annex, the Obama FBI failed to adequately review and investigate intelligence reports showing the Clinton campaign may have been ginning up the fake Trump-Russia narrative for Clinton’s political gain, which was ultimately done through the Steele Dossier and other means,” Grassley said in a statement.

“These intelligence reports and related records, whether true or false, were buried for years. History will show that the Obama and Biden administrations’ law enforcement and intelligence agencies were weaponized against President Trump,” he added.

“This political weaponization has caused critical damage to our institutions and is one of the biggest political scandals and cover-ups in American history. The new Trump administration has a tremendous responsibility to the American people to fix the damage done and do so with maximum speed and transparency.”

Last week, Director of Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard released newly declassified memos that also showed U.S. intelligence officials concluded Russia did not play a significant role in Donald Trump’s victory over Hillary Clinton.

Paul Sperry, a senior reporter for Real Clear Investigations, took to X to report that sources informed him that there are damning text messages and emails showing coordination between the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign aides.

“DEVELOPING: I’m told there are texts/emails indicating Hillary Clinton campaign aides directly coordinated with the Obama White House, NSC, State Dept and Intelligence Community officials in efforts to dig up dirt tying Donald Trump to Vladimir Putin in July 2016 …developing…” Perry wrote on X.

The documents released by Gabbard are the clearest proof yet that officials within the Obama administration had serious doubts about Russian interference, even as they proceeded with the investigation.

The memo, dated 2016, told then-President Barack Obama directly that “Russian and criminal actors did not impact recent US election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure.”

While acknowledging prior reports about a possible breach of Illinois voter rolls and failed targeting attempts in other states, the memo clearly states that those efforts never compromised voting systems—and didn’t come close to altering results.

“The targeting of infrastructure not used in casting ballots makes it highly unlikely it would have resulted in altering any state’s official vote,” the document reads. It goes further: “Criminal activity also failed to reach the scale and sophistication necessary to change election outcomes.”

The disclosure is a major vindication for Trump, who has long argued that the Russia collusion narrative was a hoax pushed by the Clinton campaign and Obama intelligence officials to sabotage his presidency before it began.

And now the pressure is turning on the people who pushed it.

FBI officials are preparing the groundwork for a possible criminal investigation into former CIA Director John Brennan, former FBI Director James Comey, and others involved in launching and running the Crossfire Hurricane probe.

This documents falsely claimed connections between Trump and Russian agents.

😭Joe Biden’s daughter has broken her silence: ‘My dad used to…

NEWS May 30, 2026 Trends7News

She said that weeks after her dad purchased the firearm, she borrowed his truck to drive from New York to Washington and that the vehicle was in good shape, and she did not notice any drug paraphernalia or evidence that drugs had been used in the truck. The testimony contradicted that of Hallie Biden, Hunter’s ex-girlfriend and ex-sister-in-law, who said the car was full of drug paraphernalia and trash when she visited him around the same time. On cross-examination, however, Naomi did admit that she received an unusual text message from her dad around five days after he purchased the weapon, around Oct. 17, 2018, The Washington Times reported: in Manhattan to swap cars In the text messages, Hunter Biden asked her if her now-husband could bring the truck to 57th and 5th Ave. in Manhattan to swap cars. “Right now?” she responded. Prosecutor Leo Wise asked if she knew what her father was doing at two o’clock in the morning or why it was so important to swap cars at that moment. No,” Naomi Biden replied, adding that her dad still “seemed good” and she was “hopeful.” “No,” Naomi Biden replied, adding that her dad still “seemed good” and she was “hopeful.” “I’m really sorry dad I can’t take this,” she wrote in a later text to Hunter Biden in October 2018. She was trying to “hang out” with her dad in New York, but he had been unreachable. Hunter Biden later replied, apologizing for not being available.

Courtroom Confrontation During Trial

As the trial began, there was a confrontation near the courthouse that made news. The wife of Hunter Biden loudly confronted an ally of former President Donald Trump outside the Delaware courtroom where the first son’s trial for allegedly lying on a federal gun background check form is taking place The wife of Hunter Biden loudly confronted an ally of former President Donald Trump outside the Delaware courtroom where the first son’s trial for allegedly lying on a federal gun background check form is taking place. Garrett Ziegler, who worked on trade policy in the White House, took part in a plot by Trump allies to make Hunter Biden, the son of Joe Biden, look bad in the final days of the 2020 election. In response, Hunter Biden sued Ziegler and the company he founded, Marco Polo, in September of last year. The lawsuit claimed that they violated state and federal laws by attempting to create a searchable online database containing 128,000 emails, NBC News reported.

During a break in the trial on Tuesday, Hunter’s wife, Melissa Cohen-Biden, saw Ziegler-who had also attended the previous day during jury selection-and confronted him During a break in the trial on Tuesday, Hunter’s wife, Melissa Cohen-Biden, saw Ziegler-who had also attended the previous day during jury selection-and confronted him. “You have no right to be here, you Nazi piece of s-!” she yelled before walking away. Eventually, she returned to her seat next to First Lady Jill Biden, who had also been attending the trial. Ziegler did not respond to Cohen-Biden’s meltdown.

Hunter Biden’s Laptop and Drug Addiction

NBC News noted further: Both the laptop and the gun charges have served to make public Hunter Biden’s longtime drug addiction and surfaced embarrassing episodes in his life Both the laptop and the gun charges have served to make public Hunter Biden’s longtime drug addiction and surfaced embarrassing episodes in his life. Trump and his GOP allies have repeatedly used the contents of the laptop to tie President Biden to his son’s shady foreign business deals. The contents of the laptop included one message that appeared to directly implicate the senior Biden – “10 percent for the big guy.” Former Biden business associate Tony Bobulinski has testified that the reference indeed meant Joe Biden and that Joe Biden was always aware of his son’s business deals, despite his repeated denials.

The laptop quickly became the subject of testimony in the trial. FBI agent Erica Jensen testified that the laptop was obtained via subpoena from the Delaware computer shop where it was abandoned in 2019. Prior to the 2020 election, the New York Post was the first to publish damning excerpts taken from the laptop. Those reports were quickly censored on social media, with the then-Twitter platform locking The Post’s account for weeks. Also, most other media outlets shunned the report, falsely claiming it was “Russian disinformation,” along with some 50 then-current and retired intelligence community officials, some of whom are now paid consultants for some of the same media outlets.

BREAKING 🚨 JUST 30 MINUTES AGO IN WASHINGTON,D.C— MELANIA TRUMP HAS BEEN CONFIRMED.

BREAKING 🚨 JUST 30 MINUTES AGO IN WASHINGTON, D.C. — MELANIA TRUMP CONFIRMED IN MAJOR ANNOUNCEMENT

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Political observers and social media users alike are reacting after a major announcement involving Melania Trump captured national attention earlier today.

The development, which emerged from Washington just moments ago, quickly became one of the most discussed topics online as supporters, commentators, and political analysts rushed to understand its significance.

What initially appeared to be an ordinary day in the nation's capital suddenly turned into a major news story as reports began circulating regarding the announcement.

Within minutes, reactions spread across social media platforms.

Supporters expressed excitement, while others waited for additional details and official statements. News organizations and political commentators immediately began discussing what the announcement could mean and why it was attracting so much attention.

Melania Trump has remained one of the most recognizable public figures in America throughout her years in the national spotlight. As former First Lady, she drew attention for her public appearances, charitable initiatives, and role during one of the most closely watched administrations in modern history.

Because of that visibility, any significant news involving her tends to generate widespread interest.

Political analysts noted that public interest surrounding the Trump family remains remarkably strong, even years after leaving the White House. Developments involving President Donald Trump, Melania Trump, and other members of the family frequently become major discussion points across television, digital media, and social platforms.

"The public continues to follow developments involving the Trump family very closely," one political observer explained. "Announcements connected to them often generate immediate attention regardless of the specific topic."

As news of the announcement spread, speculation quickly followed.

Commentators debated potential political implications, while supporters and critics offered competing interpretations of what the development might represent. Online discussions expanded rapidly, with thousands of users sharing reactions and theories within hours.

Meanwhile, journalists worked to gather additional details as interest continued to grow.

Several media outlets reported a significant increase in online searches related to Melania Trump shortly after the announcement became public. Political forums and discussion groups were similarly active as users attempted to learn more about the situation.

Observers say the speed of the reaction highlights the continuing influence of major political figures in today's media environment.

A single announcement can now reach millions of people almost instantly, creating nationwide conversations within minutes.

As the story develops, many Americans will be watching closely for further updates and official information.

For now, one thing is certain: the announcement involving Melania Trump has captured attention across Washington and beyond, generating widespread discussion and renewed public interest.

Whether the long-term impact proves significant remains to be seen, but the reaction over the past few hours demonstrates that developments involving prominent national figures continue to resonate with audiences across the country.

More details are expected as the story continues to unfold.