Law professor and Fox News legal analyst Jonathan Turley sharply criticized Virginia Democrats on Friday after the Supreme Court of Virginia struck down a proposed congressional map that would have heavily favored Democrats ahead of the midterm elections.

Turley made the remarks during an appearance on Fox News with Sean Hannity, hours after the court rejected the plan that critics said would have given Democrats an advantage in 10 of Virginia’s 11 congressional districts, Mediaite reported.

“I said this from the beginning, this will never, ever meet judicial scrutiny,” Hannity said. “Number one, the wording itself of the amendment was abusively biased. I think any objective person would say that, but that’s not even the main thing.”

Hannity argued the proposal failed because lawmakers did not follow Virginia’s constitutional procedures required to place such an amendment on the ballot.

“They have very strict constitutional procedures that they had to meet,” Hannity said. “They didn’t follow any of the procedures to get an amendment on the ballot, none of them!”

Turley agreed, saying the legal flaws in the proposal were significant and that Virginia historically has taken a stricter approach to redistricting than many other states.

“No, that’s absolutely right, Sean, and there was a host of problems, but the most glaring was that one,” Turley said. “Virginia was always the gold standard for gerrymandering. Virginia doesn’t like gerrymandering — makes it very difficult to do so.”

Turley said lawmakers attempted to rush the proposal through ahead of the midterms, but the state Supreme Court refused to approve it.

“So to get this through, they had to do a sort of bum’s rush to get this in before the midterm elections,” Turley said. “And the Supreme Court of Virginia said, ‘No, we’re not going to sign off on this.’”

Turley also targeted Gov. Abigail Spanberger, accusing her of abandoning earlier opposition to gerrymandering after taking office.

“Now, this was a face-planting of legendary size for Governor Spanberger,” Turley said. “She had previously assured voters that she was vehemently against gerrymandering.”

“And as soon as she was elected, she went to the hard left, and then asked and pushed through the most radical gerrymandering scheme in the country,” he added.

Hannity noted the campaign behind the proposal reportedly cost tens of millions of dollars, much of it fronted by a political action committee controlled by House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries. “Sixty-four million,” Hannity said during the exchange.

Turley argued the failed effort could politically damage Democrats in Virginia, particularly among independents and Republicans who viewed the proposal as an attempt to dilute their influence.

“In addition to the 64 million, they alienated half of this state,” Turley said. “A lot of Republicans and independents are not going to forget this.”

“They don’t view this as partisan; they view it as personal,” he continued. “You attempted to erase them in terms of representation.”

The discussion also turned to the national implications of the ruling and recent court decisions involving racial gerrymandering.

Hannity suggested Republicans could gain additional congressional districts nationwide as states revisit maps following Supreme Court rulings. Turley argued Democrats miscalculated by reopening the broader redistricting fight.

“This was just a breathtakingly dumb move by the Democrats,” Turley said. “When they began, when they went down this road, I wrote a column saying, you need to consider this because the Democratic states were already gerrymandered.”

Turley pointed to states such as California, Illinois and Massachusetts as examples where Democrats had already secured favorable district maps years earlier, limiting future opportunities for additional gains.

He also referenced the upcoming 2030 census and population migration trends benefiting Republican-led states.

“So the Democrats are looking at a colossal loss,” Turley said. “And I think that’s one of the reasons why they want to pack the Supreme Court and make radical changes to the constitutional system before it’s too late.”

😭Joe Biden’s daughter has broken her silence: ‘My dad used to…

NEWS May 30, 2026 Trends7News

She said that weeks after her dad purchased the firearm, she borrowed his truck to drive from New York to Washington and that the vehicle was in good shape, and she did not notice any drug paraphernalia or evidence that drugs had been used in the truck. The testimony contradicted that of Hallie Biden, Hunter’s ex-girlfriend and ex-sister-in-law, who said the car was full of drug paraphernalia and trash when she visited him around the same time. On cross-examination, however, Naomi did admit that she received an unusual text message from her dad around five days after he purchased the weapon, around Oct. 17, 2018, The Washington Times reported: in Manhattan to swap cars In the text messages, Hunter Biden asked her if her now-husband could bring the truck to 57th and 5th Ave. in Manhattan to swap cars. “Right now?” she responded. Prosecutor Leo Wise asked if she knew what her father was doing at two o’clock in the morning or why it was so important to swap cars at that moment. No,” Naomi Biden replied, adding that her dad still “seemed good” and she was “hopeful.” “No,” Naomi Biden replied, adding that her dad still “seemed good” and she was “hopeful.” “I’m really sorry dad I can’t take this,” she wrote in a later text to Hunter Biden in October 2018. She was trying to “hang out” with her dad in New York, but he had been unreachable. Hunter Biden later replied, apologizing for not being available.

Courtroom Confrontation During Trial

As the trial began, there was a confrontation near the courthouse that made news. The wife of Hunter Biden loudly confronted an ally of former President Donald Trump outside the Delaware courtroom where the first son’s trial for allegedly lying on a federal gun background check form is taking place The wife of Hunter Biden loudly confronted an ally of former President Donald Trump outside the Delaware courtroom where the first son’s trial for allegedly lying on a federal gun background check form is taking place. Garrett Ziegler, who worked on trade policy in the White House, took part in a plot by Trump allies to make Hunter Biden, the son of Joe Biden, look bad in the final days of the 2020 election. In response, Hunter Biden sued Ziegler and the company he founded, Marco Polo, in September of last year. The lawsuit claimed that they violated state and federal laws by attempting to create a searchable online database containing 128,000 emails, NBC News reported.

During a break in the trial on Tuesday, Hunter’s wife, Melissa Cohen-Biden, saw Ziegler-who had also attended the previous day during jury selection-and confronted him During a break in the trial on Tuesday, Hunter’s wife, Melissa Cohen-Biden, saw Ziegler-who had also attended the previous day during jury selection-and confronted him. “You have no right to be here, you Nazi piece of s-!” she yelled before walking away. Eventually, she returned to her seat next to First Lady Jill Biden, who had also been attending the trial. Ziegler did not respond to Cohen-Biden’s meltdown.

Hunter Biden’s Laptop and Drug Addiction

NBC News noted further: Both the laptop and the gun charges have served to make public Hunter Biden’s longtime drug addiction and surfaced embarrassing episodes in his life Both the laptop and the gun charges have served to make public Hunter Biden’s longtime drug addiction and surfaced embarrassing episodes in his life. Trump and his GOP allies have repeatedly used the contents of the laptop to tie President Biden to his son’s shady foreign business deals. The contents of the laptop included one message that appeared to directly implicate the senior Biden – “10 percent for the big guy.” Former Biden business associate Tony Bobulinski has testified that the reference indeed meant Joe Biden and that Joe Biden was always aware of his son’s business deals, despite his repeated denials.

The laptop quickly became the subject of testimony in the trial. FBI agent Erica Jensen testified that the laptop was obtained via subpoena from the Delaware computer shop where it was abandoned in 2019. Prior to the 2020 election, the New York Post was the first to publish damning excerpts taken from the laptop. Those reports were quickly censored on social media, with the then-Twitter platform locking The Post’s account for weeks. Also, most other media outlets shunned the report, falsely claiming it was “Russian disinformation,” along with some 50 then-current and retired intelligence community officials, some of whom are now paid consultants for some of the same media outlets.

BREAKING 🚨 JUST 30 MINUTES AGO IN WASHINGTON,D.C— MELANIA TRUMP HAS BEEN CONFIRMED.

BREAKING 🚨 JUST 30 MINUTES AGO IN WASHINGTON, D.C. — MELANIA TRUMP CONFIRMED IN MAJOR ANNOUNCEMENT

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Political observers and social media users alike are reacting after a major announcement involving Melania Trump captured national attention earlier today.

The development, which emerged from Washington just moments ago, quickly became one of the most discussed topics online as supporters, commentators, and political analysts rushed to understand its significance.

What initially appeared to be an ordinary day in the nation's capital suddenly turned into a major news story as reports began circulating regarding the announcement.

Within minutes, reactions spread across social media platforms.

Supporters expressed excitement, while others waited for additional details and official statements. News organizations and political commentators immediately began discussing what the announcement could mean and why it was attracting so much attention.

Melania Trump has remained one of the most recognizable public figures in America throughout her years in the national spotlight. As former First Lady, she drew attention for her public appearances, charitable initiatives, and role during one of the most closely watched administrations in modern history.

Because of that visibility, any significant news involving her tends to generate widespread interest.

Political analysts noted that public interest surrounding the Trump family remains remarkably strong, even years after leaving the White House. Developments involving President Donald Trump, Melania Trump, and other members of the family frequently become major discussion points across television, digital media, and social platforms.

"The public continues to follow developments involving the Trump family very closely," one political observer explained. "Announcements connected to them often generate immediate attention regardless of the specific topic."

As news of the announcement spread, speculation quickly followed.

Commentators debated potential political implications, while supporters and critics offered competing interpretations of what the development might represent. Online discussions expanded rapidly, with thousands of users sharing reactions and theories within hours.

Meanwhile, journalists worked to gather additional details as interest continued to grow.

Several media outlets reported a significant increase in online searches related to Melania Trump shortly after the announcement became public. Political forums and discussion groups were similarly active as users attempted to learn more about the situation.

Observers say the speed of the reaction highlights the continuing influence of major political figures in today's media environment.

A single announcement can now reach millions of people almost instantly, creating nationwide conversations within minutes.

As the story develops, many Americans will be watching closely for further updates and official information.

For now, one thing is certain: the announcement involving Melania Trump has captured attention across Washington and beyond, generating widespread discussion and renewed public interest.

Whether the long-term impact proves significant remains to be seen, but the reaction over the past few hours demonstrates that developments involving prominent national figures continue to resonate with audiences across the country.

More details are expected as the story continues to unfold.